Similarly, Adblock Plus managed to increase its daily downloads at around the same time, but both download counts did fall to previous levels shortly thereafter.AdBlock is used by more than 1 million Firefox users to block ads in Firefox, improve page load speed, and help protect their privacy. It will provide you statistics for ads during a selectable time period.The huge uptick of downloads at the end of August seems to correlate with the release of the WebExtensions versions of uBlock Origin. AdGuard AdBlocker is set up to be easy-to-configure, allowing anyone to utilize it, and you have the ability to switch it on/off for a particular website via a slider. AdGuard AdBlocker for Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and Opera is capable of blocking ads on all web pages, even on Facebook, YouTube, and others.Use AdBlock to block all ads and pop ups. However, this project has nothing to do with the latter.AdBlock is one of the most popular ad blockers worldwide with more than 60 million users on Chrome, Safari, Firefox, Edge as well as Android. To come back to the initial question: why did Adblock Plus's daily user number drop by several million users while similar extensions did not see a drop but an increase instead?It was inspired by Adblock Plus for Firefox and features many of the same tools for blocking ads. Once the procedure is over, when you browse the internet using any of the web browsers supported by Adblock Plus, the visited websites will not include banners, video ads, or. Moreover, you can also install the Adblock Plus on your Android device.
Adblock For Firefox Download AdBlock ForRise in popularity of uBlock Origin which may have had an impact on Adblock Plus's performance. While it is possible to disable the program in Adblock Plus, some users may have had troubles doing so, or made the decision to move to another content blocker instead. Adblock Plus's Acceptable Ads program might be a reason. The most popular ad blocker for Chrome and Safari, now available for Firefox Block all advertisements on all web pages, even Facebook, Youtube, and Hulu.Lets take a look at possible explanations: Download AdBlock for Firefox for Firefox.I much appreciated the state of mind of its developer (as I felt it) in which his add-on seemed to fit perfectly. Running it I found how well it was carried out, how intuitive using it was. As soon as I discovered uBO on AMO (practically at its launch I guess) I knew it’d be love :) Reading the introduction on AMO made me realize how limpid, well thought the add-on was. I had quickly enough discovered that if ABP handled nicely the ads, it handled them once downloaded but wouldn’t block 3rd-party sites according to the user’s directives in the first place. Could it be a change in reporting on Mozilla AMO?Now You: What is your take on this development?I had switched from ABP to uBO not because of the former’s ‘Acceptable Ads’ (it’s a concept, arguable, and it’s removable), not for less used resources with the latter, but because uBlock Origin managed connections to 3rd-party sites. Anyone who’s concerned by privacy (and security) should consider uBO. But we all know that the Web has changed ever since ABP was launched and that the combat includes 3rd-party sites, scripts, even CSSs, fonts, data delivered to them via simple connection etc etc. A gem.An Adblock Plus decline? I share the possibilities mentioned in the article, I have no idea of the cause and if this fits in a general trend. ABP’s download counts dropped by about 50,000, and uBlock’s downloads increased by about 50,000. This is documented in the wiki:As Firefox development keep moving forward however, things seem to have stabilized now.Another unscientific observation I have made is that it seems that when school season starts, there is an increased usage in ABP and probably now uBO as well given its wider adoption.What’s written in the article doesn’t seem to correspond to what’s shown in the charts.1) Something major happened at the end of October 2016. > The huge uptick of downloads at the end of August seems to correlate with the release of the WebExtensions versions of uBlock OriginMartin, the huge uptick was quite certainly because of the article from Stiftung Warentest which reportedly favoured uBlock Origin:I was made aware of this through someone on Twitter:I believe the release of the uBO/webext version to stable channel on AMO (roughly at the same time the article above came out) caused many departure from uBO because it ended up being afflicted by many issues in the WebExtensions framework, and by the fact that mixing legacy extensions with uBO seems to cause issues. Possibly a bit of publicity from an article or promotion?4) uBlock’s daily users has been flat since June, with just a small drop in July. If uBlock ran into problems because of the WE changeover, it seems reasonable that people might have transitioned back to ABP for the time being.3) The massive unexplained spike a couple weeks ago, which applied to both extensions. Again, no explanations there, though possibly related to a lot of uBlock users being on Nightly, and problems transitioning to WebExtensions.In fact, if you look at the numbers, it looks like uBlock lost about 30k downloaders, while ABP gained 20k-25k downloaders. I don’t see anything in uBlock’s releases around that time to have spurred a massive increase in downloads.2) Contrary to what the article says, the increase in ABP downloads in August was only modest (+25%), and the decrease in uBlock downloads was massive (-50%). Alien shooter mac emulatorThat pretty well correlates with uBlock’s drop in downloads from 75k to 60k, but not quite on ABP’s drop from 125k to 80k (36% drop). That’s a 20% loss in users, if the total population remains static (may not be the case). That means it has a better retention rate than uBlock Origin, which seems to need to replace about 1% of daily users per day.Browser market share for Firefox has dropped from 7.26% to 5.86% from Nov 2016 to Sept 2017, according to StatCounter (the first google result I checked). That vaguely corresponds to the Jan-April download rate of just over 100k, vs to the April-Sept download rate of about 80k, for a drop of about 20k per day.That means a steady-state is a loss of about 0.5% per day, and needs an equivalent number of downloads to keep the total daily users stable. The loss has been accelerating since April, with a peak drop rate of about 33k per day between then and September, vs 13k per day prior to that. On the other hand, it’s only gaining about 100k per day, so is actually working at a net loss of 100k per day.ABP, meanwhile, lost about 7m peak users between Nov 2016 and Sep 2017, which is an average drop rate of 23k per day. ![]() ![]() ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorCarolyn ArchivesCategories |